Objectives This study has been based on the implementation of the Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in 7 Italian hospitals to determine inappropriate hospital admissions and days of stay. Design A cross-sectional study. Methods The outcomes examined were: appropriateness/inappropriateness of admission and "percentage of inappropriateness". Results A total number of 2196 clinical records were reviewed. The mean percentage of inappropriateness for a hospitalization was 22%. The percentage of inappropriateness for the first ten days of hospitalization peaked in correspondence of the 4th and 5th (42%). The emergency admission was a protective factor of inappropriated admission, OR= 0.23 95%CI (0.16-0.35). To be hospitalized in a Teaching Hospital, in a hospital with ≥30 beds and to be admitted during the Winter/Autumn and in the workweek were risk factors of inappropriateness, respectively with OR=3.50 95%CI(2.30-5.34), OR=2.04 95%CI(1.41-2.97), OR=2.14 95%CI(1.41-2.97), OR=1.85 95%CI(1.12-3.04). The linear regression model underlined that the "percentage of inappropriateness" significantly increased in inappropriate admission and in obstetric wards with ≥30 beds; the admission in a Teaching Hospital and the hospitalization in South Italy was inversely associated to the percentage of inappropriateness. The R2 model was 0.367. Conclusions The present study suggests that the percentage of inappropriate admission depends especially on the inappropriate admission and the large number of beds in obstetric wards. This suggests that the management of big hospitals, which is very complex, needs improving the processes of support and coordination of health professionals. The obstetric AEP tool seems to be an useful instrument for the decision makers to monitor and manage the obstetric wards.

A multicenter study on the appropriateness of hospitalization in obstetric wards: application of Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (Obstetric AEP). Studio multicentrico sul protocollo di revisione dell’uso dell’ospedale in ostetricia: applicazione dello PRotocollo dell’Uso dell’Ospedale in Ostetricia (PRUO ostetrico)

MANNOCCI, Alice
2014

Abstract

Objectives This study has been based on the implementation of the Obstetric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in 7 Italian hospitals to determine inappropriate hospital admissions and days of stay. Design A cross-sectional study. Methods The outcomes examined were: appropriateness/inappropriateness of admission and "percentage of inappropriateness". Results A total number of 2196 clinical records were reviewed. The mean percentage of inappropriateness for a hospitalization was 22%. The percentage of inappropriateness for the first ten days of hospitalization peaked in correspondence of the 4th and 5th (42%). The emergency admission was a protective factor of inappropriated admission, OR= 0.23 95%CI (0.16-0.35). To be hospitalized in a Teaching Hospital, in a hospital with ≥30 beds and to be admitted during the Winter/Autumn and in the workweek were risk factors of inappropriateness, respectively with OR=3.50 95%CI(2.30-5.34), OR=2.04 95%CI(1.41-2.97), OR=2.14 95%CI(1.41-2.97), OR=1.85 95%CI(1.12-3.04). The linear regression model underlined that the "percentage of inappropriateness" significantly increased in inappropriate admission and in obstetric wards with ≥30 beds; the admission in a Teaching Hospital and the hospitalization in South Italy was inversely associated to the percentage of inappropriateness. The R2 model was 0.367. Conclusions The present study suggests that the percentage of inappropriate admission depends especially on the inappropriate admission and the large number of beds in obstetric wards. This suggests that the management of big hospitals, which is very complex, needs improving the processes of support and coordination of health professionals. The obstetric AEP tool seems to be an useful instrument for the decision makers to monitor and manage the obstetric wards.
12-mar-2014
Inglese
obstetrics
BOCCIA, Antonio
LA TORRE, Giuseppe
TARSITANI, Gianfranco
Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tesi di dottorato di ricerca Mannocci A.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 276.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
276.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/99534
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIROMA1-99534