Azacitidine and Lenalidomide Combination Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Topography and Translational Relevance of Nuclear Phospholipase C β - dependent Signalling

Nuclear inositide signalling pathways, and particularly those regulated by PI-PLCβ1, are associated with cell proliferation and differentiation. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous spectrum of chronic myeloid hemopathies with associated symptomatic cytopenias and substantial potential for evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MDS patients are currently treated with two main approaches, epigenetic (Azacitidine) and immunomodulatory (Lenalidomide: above all in cell clones bearing a deletion of the long arm of the chromosome 5 [del(5q)]). As Azacitidine and Lenalidomide alone can show adverse effects or patients can be refractory, an experimental current approach is the combination of the two drugs. Clinically, this combination therapy is promising, while its molecular effect has to be clarified. Stemming from these data, in this study the effect of an Azacitidine-Lenalidomide combination therapy was studied, in both MDS patients and hematopoietic cell lines. The specific aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of Azacitidine and Lenalidomide MDS therapy on: cell cycle regulation, hematopoietic differentiation, gene mutation and miR expression. Lenalidomide alone, via PI-PLCβ1/PKC pathway, was able to induce a selective G0/G1 arrest of the cell cycle in del(5q) cells, slowing down their rate proliferation and favouring erythropoiesis activation. In addition, although the mutation profile at baseline was not entirely capable of predicting the clinical effect of Azacitidine and Lenalidomide therapy, the presence of specific point mutations affecting three inositide genes (PI3KCD, AKT3, PLCG2) was correlated to and anticipated a negative clinical outcome. Moreover, the differential miR expression was detectable even from the 4th cycle of therapy in responder patients, as compared to non-responders. In MDS, this is the first evidence that the molecular mutation profiling of inositide genes or a specific mini-cluster of differentially expressed miRs, targeting inositide signaling molecules, can be associated with the clinical response, thus possibly predicting the effect of the therapy.