This thesis collects three articles in Law & Economics which I have written. The first is a theoretical piece, resolving several paradoxes in theories of bounded rationality and generalized expected utility. The second is a an application of the "meta-rational" approach developed in the first chapter to criminal law. The third chapter is independent from the previous two chapters, and presents several economic arguments against the regulation of speech.
Essays in Law & Economics
2019
Abstract
This thesis collects three articles in Law & Economics which I have written. The first is a theoretical piece, resolving several paradoxes in theories of bounded rationality and generalized expected utility. The second is a an application of the "meta-rational" approach developed in the first chapter to criminal law. The third chapter is independent from the previous two chapters, and presents several economic arguments against the regulation of speech.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pi_Daniel_tesi.pdf
accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione
2.11 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/152567
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è
URN:NBN:IT:UNIBO-152567