The present activity provides a contribution to the analysis of advanced fuel cycles with special attention to resources, waste inventory and infrastructures needs. The activity has been developed to get an overview about the challenges, implications, boundary conditions, assumptions and correlated consequences of different scenarios suggested or envisaged for the deployment of nuclear energy (mainly for electricity production) on a global or regional basis. In this context, the implications of the LWRs use (in terms of resources, fuel cycle facilities, waste production, etc.) and the possible transition to FRs, in terms of Pu availability, enlargement of reprocessing capacities, etc., are key points of the analysis. A reference scenario has been studied in detail and used as "unit of measure" for extrapolation to more complex scenarios (e.g. European scenarios). The "once-through" strategy, where only LWRs are deployed has been compared with respect to advanced fuel cycle based on P&T. Several FR concepts (lead and sodium cooled) have been compared in terms of fuel cycle performances.

Analysis of Transition Nuclear Fuel Cycles from LWRs to Gen-IV Reactors

2011

Abstract

The present activity provides a contribution to the analysis of advanced fuel cycles with special attention to resources, waste inventory and infrastructures needs. The activity has been developed to get an overview about the challenges, implications, boundary conditions, assumptions and correlated consequences of different scenarios suggested or envisaged for the deployment of nuclear energy (mainly for electricity production) on a global or regional basis. In this context, the implications of the LWRs use (in terms of resources, fuel cycle facilities, waste production, etc.) and the possible transition to FRs, in terms of Pu availability, enlargement of reprocessing capacities, etc., are key points of the analysis. A reference scenario has been studied in detail and used as "unit of measure" for extrapolation to more complex scenarios (e.g. European scenarios). The "once-through" strategy, where only LWRs are deployed has been compared with respect to advanced fuel cycle based on P&T. Several FR concepts (lead and sodium cooled) have been compared in terms of fuel cycle performances.
15-ago-2011
Italiano
Forasassi, Giuseppe
Cerullo, Nicola
Fineschi, Fabio
Lomonaco, Guglielmo
Salvatores, Massimo
Ambrosini, Walter
Carpignano, Andrea
Vella, Giuseppe
Università degli Studi di Pisa
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PhDThesis.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 5.85 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.85 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/154231
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIPI-154231