The dissertation investigates how Charles S. Peirce deals with teleological tendencies in thought. I argue that Peirce’s account of human purposefulness in thinking is first of all heuristic. Purposefulness is thus a principle that enables us to acquire new knowledge and apply past knowledge to new situations. As such, it guides us toward a systematization of our experience and knowledge. Peirce approaches these themes in his ‘methodeutic’ and in his esthetics. I read these disciplines in light of Immanuel Kant’s regulative principles. Peirce’s treatment of purposefulness is thus shown to be in continuity with Kant. However, many differences will be indicated as well, first of all: the different ways in which they consider metaphysics. Eventually, purposefulness is revealed to be far more important for Peirce. To finish, I use Kant’s own writings to develop an account of transcendental philosophy which is not foundational, or anti-skeptical. In this fashion, transcendental philosophy can coexist with fallibilism and so be applicable to Peirce’s philosophy and pragmatism.

Peirce's Account of Purposefulness: A 'Methodeutical' Principle

2009

Abstract

The dissertation investigates how Charles S. Peirce deals with teleological tendencies in thought. I argue that Peirce’s account of human purposefulness in thinking is first of all heuristic. Purposefulness is thus a principle that enables us to acquire new knowledge and apply past knowledge to new situations. As such, it guides us toward a systematization of our experience and knowledge. Peirce approaches these themes in his ‘methodeutic’ and in his esthetics. I read these disciplines in light of Immanuel Kant’s regulative principles. Peirce’s treatment of purposefulness is thus shown to be in continuity with Kant. However, many differences will be indicated as well, first of all: the different ways in which they consider metaphysics. Eventually, purposefulness is revealed to be far more important for Peirce. To finish, I use Kant’s own writings to develop an account of transcendental philosophy which is not foundational, or anti-skeptical. In this fashion, transcendental philosophy can coexist with fallibilism and so be applicable to Peirce’s philosophy and pragmatism.
1-set-2009
Italiano
Ferrarin, Alfredo
Università degli Studi di Pisa
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tesi_PhD_G.GAVA.pdf

embargo fino al 28/09/2049

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 1.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.53 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/154898
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIPI-154898