After a thorough review of the existing literature on crime prevention and a critical assessment of the limitations and unintended consequences of punitive justice, the thesis underlines the persuasive dynamics that revolve around the penal precept and its motivational charge in support of free conforming choices by citizens. It also explores the contribution of responsive regulation and restorative justice as instruments to promote ex ante and ex post compliance. The theoretical framework outlined has led to a reinterpretation of criminal compliance (d. lgs 231/2001) and restorative justice (d. lgs 150/2022) as choices of criminal policy in which it is possible to discern the intertwining of 'general-special' preventive and 'special-general' preventive effects of a mature interlocution between those who produce the rule and those who are called upon to respect it. This intertwining facilitates the orientation of the 'genetic process of the rules' and the 'maintenance mechanism of the same' in order to prevent the commission of crimes or to eliminate or correct their causes. It also makes it possible to learn 'from critical events' and to (re)activate a virtuous circle 'in the name' of legality.
Premessa una ricostruzione della letteratura sulla prevenzione dei reati e una rivisitazione critica dei principali limiti ed «effetti collaterali» della giustizia punitiva, la tesi valorizza la dinamica persuasiva che ruota attorno al precetto penale e la sua carica motivazionale a sostegno di libere scelte conformi da parte dei consociati e indaga il contributo della responsive regulation e della restorative justice come strumenti di promozione della conformità alle norme ex ante ed ex post. Il quadro teoretico delineato ha condotto a rileggere la compliance penale, di cui al d.lgs. 231/2001, e la giustizia riparativa, di cui al d.lgs. 150/2022, quali scelte di politica criminale in cui è possibile rinvenire tracce di una ‘special-general’ prevenzione ‘persuasiva’ in grado di orientare il «processo genetico delle regole» e il «meccanismo di manutenzione delle stesse» al fine di prevenire la commissione dei reati o di rimuoverne o di correggerne le cause, apprendendo «dagli eventi critici» e (ri)attivando un circolo virtuoso «all’insegna» della legalità.
VERSO NUOVE STRATEGIE DI PREVENZIONE DEI REATI? IL CONTRUBUTO DELLA RESPONSIVE REGULATION E DELLA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Acconcia, Anna
2025
Abstract
After a thorough review of the existing literature on crime prevention and a critical assessment of the limitations and unintended consequences of punitive justice, the thesis underlines the persuasive dynamics that revolve around the penal precept and its motivational charge in support of free conforming choices by citizens. It also explores the contribution of responsive regulation and restorative justice as instruments to promote ex ante and ex post compliance. The theoretical framework outlined has led to a reinterpretation of criminal compliance (d. lgs 231/2001) and restorative justice (d. lgs 150/2022) as choices of criminal policy in which it is possible to discern the intertwining of 'general-special' preventive and 'special-general' preventive effects of a mature interlocution between those who produce the rule and those who are called upon to respect it. This intertwining facilitates the orientation of the 'genetic process of the rules' and the 'maintenance mechanism of the same' in order to prevent the commission of crimes or to eliminate or correct their causes. It also makes it possible to learn 'from critical events' and to (re)activate a virtuous circle 'in the name' of legality.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tesiphd_completa_Acconcia.pdf
accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR
Dimensione
2.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/208621
URN:NBN:IT:UNICATT-208621