The study serves as a historical-reconstructive path of aequitas, since the Greek and Roman origins of its notion, and aims to analyze the literary, jurisprudential and legislative traces left by those subjects, who were the main defenders of equitable demands in the experience Roman jurisprudence. This investigation only apparently aims to distinguish between different types of aequitas depending on the different sources or different subjects examined, but in reality it aims to demonstrate how the various experiences of resorting to the equity instrument are nothing more than forms of expression of a single criterion, to the definition of which - both from a theoretical and operational point of view - the centuries-old and laborious work of Roman jurisprudence.
Il presente studio funge da percorso storico-ricostruttivo dell'aequitas sin dalle origini, greche e romane, della sua nozione e mira ad analizzare le tracce letterarie, giurisprudenziali e legislative lasciate da quei soggetti, che furono i principali difensori delle istanze equitative nell’esperienza giuridica romana. Tale indagine solo apparentemente si propone di distinguere tra diverse tipologie di aequitas a seconda delle diverse fonti o dei diversi organi presi in esame, ma in realtà punta a dimostrare come le varie esperienze di ricorso allo strumento equitativo non sono altro che forme di estrinsecazione di un unico criterio, alla cui definizione - sia sotto il profilo teorico che operativo - ha contribuito in misura determinante, se non esclusiva, la plurisecolare e laboriosa opera della giurisprudenza romana.
Aequitas pretoria ed aequitas giurisprudenziale: Il contributo dei protagonisti del processo privato romano ad tutelam aequitatis.
SQUADRITO, ALFIO
2025
Abstract
The study serves as a historical-reconstructive path of aequitas, since the Greek and Roman origins of its notion, and aims to analyze the literary, jurisprudential and legislative traces left by those subjects, who were the main defenders of equitable demands in the experience Roman jurisprudence. This investigation only apparently aims to distinguish between different types of aequitas depending on the different sources or different subjects examined, but in reality it aims to demonstrate how the various experiences of resorting to the equity instrument are nothing more than forms of expression of a single criterion, to the definition of which - both from a theoretical and operational point of view - the centuries-old and laborious work of Roman jurisprudence.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tesi Squadrito Alfio.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
1.65 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.65 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/218838
URN:NBN:IT:UNICT-218838