Between 1950 and 1980, a new form of labyrinth took shape, in novels by European authors such as Michel Butor, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Italo Calvino, Patrick Modiano and Alasdair Gray. This labyrinth is elusive and can't be mapped. In order to describe it, we must take into account both the model of the rhizome, from the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Fà©lix Guattari, and Michel Foucault's concept of heterotopias. The spatiality of these novels also leads us to consider the rewriting of the labyrinth myth along with the characters Theseus, Ariadne, the Minotaur, and Dedalus. The resulting adaptations use irony as well as parody and satire, inviting us to consider their distance from the traditional model and the effects of what can be called « bricolage mythique ». The novelistic representation of the labyrinth stresses the absence of the centre on the one hand, and, on the other, points to the extreme openness of the contemporary city. As the authors get fuller awareness of the labyrinthine aspects of urban spaces, their texts themselves gradually start to take on a maze-like form: therefore, the space of fiction becomes metafictional space. Between the Fifties and the early Seventies, the Nà©oromanciers emphasized the idea of a possible play-like attitude through the instruments of fiction, in order to heighten the absence of meaning in city life as well as in the practice of writing itself. Calvino innovates this concept of fiction, emphasizing the importance of a meaning, however hidden it might be. For this reason, at the end of the period that we are investigating, other authors, such as Modiano and Gray, inherit their forerunners' paradigm of the labyrinth, but in order to adapt it to their own ethic responsibility.
La ville comme labyrinthe: rà©à©critures d'un mythe entre les annà©es 1950 et 1980
2012
Abstract
Between 1950 and 1980, a new form of labyrinth took shape, in novels by European authors such as Michel Butor, Alain Robbe-Grillet, Italo Calvino, Patrick Modiano and Alasdair Gray. This labyrinth is elusive and can't be mapped. In order to describe it, we must take into account both the model of the rhizome, from the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Fà©lix Guattari, and Michel Foucault's concept of heterotopias. The spatiality of these novels also leads us to consider the rewriting of the labyrinth myth along with the characters Theseus, Ariadne, the Minotaur, and Dedalus. The resulting adaptations use irony as well as parody and satire, inviting us to consider their distance from the traditional model and the effects of what can be called « bricolage mythique ». The novelistic representation of the labyrinth stresses the absence of the centre on the one hand, and, on the other, points to the extreme openness of the contemporary city. As the authors get fuller awareness of the labyrinthine aspects of urban spaces, their texts themselves gradually start to take on a maze-like form: therefore, the space of fiction becomes metafictional space. Between the Fifties and the early Seventies, the Nà©oromanciers emphasized the idea of a possible play-like attitude through the instruments of fiction, in order to heighten the absence of meaning in city life as well as in the practice of writing itself. Calvino innovates this concept of fiction, emphasizing the importance of a meaning, however hidden it might be. For this reason, at the end of the period that we are investigating, other authors, such as Modiano and Gray, inherit their forerunners' paradigm of the labyrinth, but in order to adapt it to their own ethic responsibility.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bolzoni_Enrico_Ville.pdf
accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
4.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/319128
URN:NBN:IT:BNCF-319128