The aim of this work is to investigate whether the actual position of a stimulus is more relevant than intuitive knowledge about the direction of an object's movement and the participants' intention (Michaels 1988; Hommel, 1993; Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu and Weeks, 1993; Ansorge, 2000). To investigate this we used a spatial compatibility task in 4 experiments replicating what had be done by Hommel (1993) and Micheals (1988), but changing a single aspect of the procedure: neither the movement nor the effects of the action were visible to the participant. The experimental task asked them to simply imagine an action in movement.
Il rapporto tra percezione e previsione in compiti di compatibilità spaziale
2009
Abstract
The aim of this work is to investigate whether the actual position of a stimulus is more relevant than intuitive knowledge about the direction of an object's movement and the participants' intention (Michaels 1988; Hommel, 1993; Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu and Weeks, 1993; Ansorge, 2000). To investigate this we used a spatial compatibility task in 4 experiments replicating what had be done by Hommel (1993) and Micheals (1988), but changing a single aspect of the procedure: neither the movement nor the effects of the action were visible to the participant. The experimental task asked them to simply imagine an action in movement.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valentina_Bazzarin_tesi.pdf
accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
3.55 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/326349
URN:NBN:IT:BNCF-326349