The aim of this work is to investigate whether the actual position of a stimulus is more relevant than intuitive knowledge about the direction of an object's movement and the participants' intention (Michaels 1988; Hommel, 1993; Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu and Weeks, 1993; Ansorge, 2000). To investigate this we used a spatial compatibility task in 4 experiments replicating what had be done by Hommel (1993) and Micheals (1988), but changing a single aspect of the procedure: neither the movement nor the effects of the action were visible to the participant. The experimental task asked them to simply imagine an action in movement.

Il rapporto tra percezione e previsione in compiti di compatibilità  spaziale

2009

Abstract

The aim of this work is to investigate whether the actual position of a stimulus is more relevant than intuitive knowledge about the direction of an object's movement and the participants' intention (Michaels 1988; Hommel, 1993; Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu and Weeks, 1993; Ansorge, 2000). To investigate this we used a spatial compatibility task in 4 experiments replicating what had be done by Hommel (1993) and Micheals (1988), but changing a single aspect of the procedure: neither the movement nor the effects of the action were visible to the participant. The experimental task asked them to simply imagine an action in movement.
2009
it
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Valentina_Bazzarin_tesi.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 3.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.55 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/326349
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:BNCF-326349