This doctoral research stems from the intention to explore in depth the complex and multifaceted domain of Executive Functions (EFs), a central construct in contemporary cognitive psychology and neuroscience. In a world marked by increasing cognitive, emotional, and decision-related demands, understanding the mechanisms that govern goal-directed behavior is not only a theoretical pursuit but also a practical necessity. Executive Functions have long been the subject of intense scientific debate. Despite decades of research, fundamental questions remain unresolved, including whether EFs represent a unitary or multidimensional construct, how they should be operationally defined, and what their precise neural correlates are. Through a critical review of both classical and modern theoretical frameworks – from the pioneering work of Luria and Lezak to recent neurocognitive and metacognitive perspectives – this dissertation aims to clarify the internal architecture of EFs, with particular focus on the interplay between cognitive, emotional, and motivational components. Among these components, decision-making plays a particularly central role. Widely recognized as a core executive function, it embodies the dynamic integration of cognitive control, emotional processing, and contextual adaptation. This project investigates how feedback and metacognitive monitoring influence decision-making across different experimental paradigms, drawing on neurophysiological measures – notably electroencephalography (EEG) – to uncover the underlying mechanisms that support adaptive behavior. By integrating theory and empirical evidence, this work seeks to provide both a conceptual contribution to the field and a foundation for future applied research in contexts such as education, clinical intervention, and organizational development, where the enhancement of executive functioning can promote autonomy, cognitive flexibility, and strategic self-regulation
Questa tesi di dottorato nasce dall’intento di esplorare in modo approfondito il complesso e sfaccettato dominio delle Funzioni Esecutive (FE), un costrutto centrale nella psicologia cognitiva e nelle neuroscienze contemporanee. In un mondo caratterizzato da crescenti richieste cognitive, emotive e decisionali, comprendere i meccanismi che regolano il comportamento orientato agli obiettivi non rappresenta soltanto una sfida teorica, ma anche una necessità pratica. Le Funzioni Esecutive sono da lungo tempo oggetto di un intenso dibattito scientifico. Nonostante decenni di ricerche, permangono questioni fondamentali irrisolte, tra cui se le FE costituiscano un costrutto unitario o multidimensionale, come debbano essere definite operativamente e quali siano i loro precisi correlati neurali. Attraverso una revisione critica dei principali quadri teorici, sia classici sia moderni – dai lavori pionieristici di Luria e Lezak alle più recenti prospettive neurocognitive e metacognitive – questa tesi si propone di chiarire l’architettura interna delle FE, con particolare attenzione all’interazione tra componenti cognitive, emotive e motivazionali. Tra queste componenti, il processo decisionale riveste un ruolo particolarmente centrale. Ampiamente riconosciuto come una funzione esecutiva fondamentale, esso incarna l’integrazione dinamica del controllo cognitivo, dell’elaborazione emotiva e dell’adattamento al contesto. Il presente progetto indaga il modo in cui il feedback e il monitoraggio metacognitivo influenzano il decision-making in diversi paradigmi sperimentali, avvalendosi di misure neurofisiologiche – in particolare dell’elettroencefalografia (EEG) – per svelare i meccanismi sottostanti che supportano il comportamento adattivo. Integrando teoria ed evidenze empiriche, questo lavoro intende offrire sia un contributo concettuale al campo di studio sia una base per future ricerche applicative in ambiti quali l’educazione, l’intervento clinico e lo sviluppo organizzativo, nei quali il potenziamento delle funzioni esecutive può favorire l’autonomia, la flessibilità cognitiva e l’autoregolazione strategica.
CHOOSING WITH AWARENESS: THE ROLE OF FEEDBACK AND METACOGNITION IN DECISION-MAKING FROM A NEUROSCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE
Allegretta, Roberta Antonia
2026
Abstract
This doctoral research stems from the intention to explore in depth the complex and multifaceted domain of Executive Functions (EFs), a central construct in contemporary cognitive psychology and neuroscience. In a world marked by increasing cognitive, emotional, and decision-related demands, understanding the mechanisms that govern goal-directed behavior is not only a theoretical pursuit but also a practical necessity. Executive Functions have long been the subject of intense scientific debate. Despite decades of research, fundamental questions remain unresolved, including whether EFs represent a unitary or multidimensional construct, how they should be operationally defined, and what their precise neural correlates are. Through a critical review of both classical and modern theoretical frameworks – from the pioneering work of Luria and Lezak to recent neurocognitive and metacognitive perspectives – this dissertation aims to clarify the internal architecture of EFs, with particular focus on the interplay between cognitive, emotional, and motivational components. Among these components, decision-making plays a particularly central role. Widely recognized as a core executive function, it embodies the dynamic integration of cognitive control, emotional processing, and contextual adaptation. This project investigates how feedback and metacognitive monitoring influence decision-making across different experimental paradigms, drawing on neurophysiological measures – notably electroencephalography (EEG) – to uncover the underlying mechanisms that support adaptive behavior. By integrating theory and empirical evidence, this work seeks to provide both a conceptual contribution to the field and a foundation for future applied research in contexts such as education, clinical intervention, and organizational development, where the enhancement of executive functioning can promote autonomy, cognitive flexibility, and strategic self-regulation| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
tesiphd_completa_allegretta.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
3.37 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.37 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/356346
URN:NBN:IT:UNICATT-356346