This study investigates the complex, nuanced relationship between consensus and social capital within the framework of a repopulation initiative located in a remote mountainous region. The research examines the influence of three distinct forms of social capital - bonding, bridging, and linking - on the consensus-building process, which is pivotal for legitimising such initiatives. Utilising a case study methodology, the research encompasses a comprehensive dataset derived from 409 questionnaires and 17 semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders. The quantitative analysis reveals a positive relation between the identified forms of social capital and the consensus construct. Moreover, the qualitative findings illuminate the underlying mechanisms through which social capital may either positively or negatively impact consensus thought individuals' propriety beliefs. This study posits that all three forms of social capital can substantially bolster consensus. However, it emphasises that addressing the diverse propriety beliefs associated with these social capital forms is essential for establishing a foundation for the long-term sustainability of similar initiatives. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of social dynamics in repopulation initiatives, highlighting the critical role of social capital and individuals' propriety beliefs.
Beyond numbers: accounting, people, and relationships in rural repopulation initiatives
Miccolis, Alessandra
2026
Abstract
This study investigates the complex, nuanced relationship between consensus and social capital within the framework of a repopulation initiative located in a remote mountainous region. The research examines the influence of three distinct forms of social capital - bonding, bridging, and linking - on the consensus-building process, which is pivotal for legitimising such initiatives. Utilising a case study methodology, the research encompasses a comprehensive dataset derived from 409 questionnaires and 17 semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders. The quantitative analysis reveals a positive relation between the identified forms of social capital and the consensus construct. Moreover, the qualitative findings illuminate the underlying mechanisms through which social capital may either positively or negatively impact consensus thought individuals' propriety beliefs. This study posits that all three forms of social capital can substantially bolster consensus. However, it emphasises that addressing the diverse propriety beliefs associated with these social capital forms is essential for establishing a foundation for the long-term sustainability of similar initiatives. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of social dynamics in repopulation initiatives, highlighting the critical role of social capital and individuals' propriety beliefs.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thesis_Alessandra Miccolis.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.74 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.74 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/357233
URN:NBN:IT:UNITN-357233