Large firms exhibit systematically higher capital intensity relative to peers, a fact at odds with standard models where firms’ technological differences are factor-neutral. This paper develops a general equilibrium framework in which firms expand by adapting their technology in order to adopt capital goods when they become cheaper. Firms can pay a firm-specific switching cost to change their production technology for a more capital-intensive one. As the cost of capital falls due to capital-embodied technical change, the firms that face the smallest switching costs become relatively more capital intensive and gain a competitive edge. This allows them to build market shares and markups. Markups endogeneity generates strategic interactions which widens further the dispersion in capital intensity and market shares. The model provides a unified explanation for rising dispersion in markups, a falling aggregate labor share despite a rising median labor share, investment weakness, and the divergence between sales and employment concentration. \textit{JEL Codes:} D21, D24, E22, E25, L11, L16.
Essays in Firms Dynamics and the Role of Capital Intensity
DESAZARS DE MONTGAILHARD, GERAUD FRANCOIS MARIE DEODAT
2026
Abstract
Large firms exhibit systematically higher capital intensity relative to peers, a fact at odds with standard models where firms’ technological differences are factor-neutral. This paper develops a general equilibrium framework in which firms expand by adapting their technology in order to adopt capital goods when they become cheaper. Firms can pay a firm-specific switching cost to change their production technology for a more capital-intensive one. As the cost of capital falls due to capital-embodied technical change, the firms that face the smallest switching costs become relatively more capital intensive and gain a competitive edge. This allows them to build market shares and markups. Markups endogeneity generates strategic interactions which widens further the dispersion in capital intensity and market shares. The model provides a unified explanation for rising dispersion in markups, a falling aggregate labor share despite a rising median labor share, investment weakness, and the divergence between sales and employment concentration. \textit{JEL Codes:} D21, D24, E22, E25, L11, L16.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thesis_march.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
2.15 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/374090
URN:NBN:IT:UNIBOCCONI-374090