Large firms exhibit systematically higher capital intensity relative to peers, a fact at odds with standard models where firms’ technological differences are factor-neutral. This paper develops a general equilibrium framework in which firms expand by adapting their technology in order to adopt capital goods when they become cheaper. Firms can pay a firm-specific switching cost to change their production technology for a more capital-intensive one. As the cost of capital falls due to capital-embodied technical change, the firms that face the smallest switching costs become relatively more capital intensive and gain a competitive edge. This allows them to build market shares and markups. Markups endogeneity generates strategic interactions which widens further the dispersion in capital intensity and market shares. The model provides a unified explanation for rising dispersion in markups, a falling aggregate labor share despite a rising median labor share, investment weakness, and the divergence between sales and employment concentration. \textit{JEL Codes:} D21, D24, E22, E25, L11, L16.

Essays in Firms Dynamics and the Role of Capital Intensity

DESAZARS DE MONTGAILHARD, GERAUD FRANCOIS MARIE DEODAT
2026

Abstract

Large firms exhibit systematically higher capital intensity relative to peers, a fact at odds with standard models where firms’ technological differences are factor-neutral. This paper develops a general equilibrium framework in which firms expand by adapting their technology in order to adopt capital goods when they become cheaper. Firms can pay a firm-specific switching cost to change their production technology for a more capital-intensive one. As the cost of capital falls due to capital-embodied technical change, the firms that face the smallest switching costs become relatively more capital intensive and gain a competitive edge. This allows them to build market shares and markups. Markups endogeneity generates strategic interactions which widens further the dispersion in capital intensity and market shares. The model provides a unified explanation for rising dispersion in markups, a falling aggregate labor share despite a rising median labor share, investment weakness, and the divergence between sales and employment concentration. \textit{JEL Codes:} D21, D24, E22, E25, L11, L16.
26-giu-2026
Inglese
GRASSI, BASILE
SERGEYEV, DMYTRO
Università Bocconi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thesis_march.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/374090
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIBOCCONI-374090