The research offers some insights on the nature and function of the “partial agreement”, by which the parties, opting for an organizational choice alternative to the traditional concept of legal situation, decide to focus and achieve their own negotiating interests during a procedural sequence. The incompleteness becomes, in the context of the present research, a “conceptual hypothesis" verifiable in different negotiating types, whether or not provided by the legislator, characterized by the fact that the autoregulation presents intrinsic needs of completion by virtue of an original organizational decision of the parties.

Il regolamento "incompleto" di interessi nella prospettiva dell'autonomia privata procedimentale

GALISAI, LAURA
2019

Abstract

The research offers some insights on the nature and function of the “partial agreement”, by which the parties, opting for an organizational choice alternative to the traditional concept of legal situation, decide to focus and achieve their own negotiating interests during a procedural sequence. The incompleteness becomes, in the context of the present research, a “conceptual hypothesis" verifiable in different negotiating types, whether or not provided by the legislator, characterized by the fact that the autoregulation presents intrinsic needs of completion by virtue of an original organizational decision of the parties.
15-feb-2019
Italiano
CAREDDA, VALERIA
Università degli Studi di Cagliari
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
tesi dottorato Laura Galisai.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/70016
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNICA-70016