With this study, it has analysed the current discipline about the application of precautionary measures in the preliminary investigation phase, envisaging possible interventions by the Italian legislator. On the premise of the guarantees provided for the protection of personal freedom, both at the constitutional and supranational level, some paradoxes of the current precautionary discipline are identified, paradoxes which legitimise the application of the precautionary measures ‘inaudita altera parte’ and without any effective reintegration of the right to cross-examination for the suspect. Then, a historical-normative analysis of the English precautionary discipline, in bringing out the multipurpose potential of the bail institution, detects the many and still unsolved problems of the Pre-Charge Bail (PCB) and the Release Under Investigation (RUI). The study concludes by calling the reader's attention to meditate on the many advantages that could derive - in terms of procedural guarantees and deflation of the prison population - from the reintroduction of bail and the effective respect of the adversarial principle in the application of the coercive precautionary measures in Italy.
Con questo studio, si analizza la disciplina vigente in materia di contraddittorio cautelare nella fase delle indagini preliminari, prospettando, in ottica de iure condendo, possibili interventi da parte del legislatore italiano. Sulla premessa delle garanzie poste a tutela della libertà personale, sia a livello costituzionale sia a livello sovranazionale, vengono rilevati alcuni paradossi della disciplina cautelare attuale che vede legittimare l’applicazione delle misure cautelari personali, di tipo coercitivo, inaudita altera parte e senza alcuna re-integrazione effettiva del diritto dell’indagato al contraddittorio. Segue un’analisi storico-normativa della disciplina cautelare inglese che, nel fare emergere le polivalenti potenzialità dell’istituto del bail, rileva i tanti ed ancora irrisolti problemi del Pre-Charge Bail (PCB) e del Release Under Investigation (RUI). Lo studio si conclude richiamando l’attenzione del lettore a meditare sui tanti vantaggi che potrebbero derivare – in termini di garanzie processuali e deflazione della popolazione carceraria – dalla reintroduzione della libertà su cauzione e dalla previsione di un contradditorio anticipato nell’iter applicativo delle misure cautelari di tipo coercitivo in Italia.
Libertà su cauzione e contraddittorio anticipato. Quali spazi di praticabilità nel sistema cautelare italiano?
GIANGRECO, MATTIA
2021
Abstract
With this study, it has analysed the current discipline about the application of precautionary measures in the preliminary investigation phase, envisaging possible interventions by the Italian legislator. On the premise of the guarantees provided for the protection of personal freedom, both at the constitutional and supranational level, some paradoxes of the current precautionary discipline are identified, paradoxes which legitimise the application of the precautionary measures ‘inaudita altera parte’ and without any effective reintegration of the right to cross-examination for the suspect. Then, a historical-normative analysis of the English precautionary discipline, in bringing out the multipurpose potential of the bail institution, detects the many and still unsolved problems of the Pre-Charge Bail (PCB) and the Release Under Investigation (RUI). The study concludes by calling the reader's attention to meditate on the many advantages that could derive - in terms of procedural guarantees and deflation of the prison population - from the reintroduction of bail and the effective respect of the adversarial principle in the application of the coercive precautionary measures in Italy.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tesi di dottorato - GIANGRECO MATTIA 20210416150155.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
2.22 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/73629
URN:NBN:IT:UNICT-73629