This dissertation examines the rules governing the invalidity of resolutions adopted by boards of directors. In the system that has emerged from certain legislative developments, it identifies a new system of rules on invalidity which, together with the rules governing invalid meeting resolutions, constitutes a special system differing from the rules governing the invalidity of contracts. Within this special system, the dissertation then identifies a single macro-category of invalidity, containing a graduated scale of cases according to the type of flaw and decision-making body involved. In light of these conclusions, the dissertation then goes on to examine the actual scope of the new provisions reflecting the legislator’s search for a fair solution that balances the harm suffered by a company when a resolution is challenged and that suffered by its shareholder or, more widely, by legal relationships when a flawed resolution remains in place. The dissertation finds – with regard to resolutions adopted by boards of directors – that the protection offered by the rules is not entirely effective, since they do not cover all possible flaws and do not allow shareholders to challenge flawed board resolutions.

L'INVALIDITÀ DELLE DELIBERE CONSILIARI DI S.P.A. NEL QUADRO DEL SISTEMA DELLE INVALIDITÀ

SELVINI, MONICA
2012

Abstract

This dissertation examines the rules governing the invalidity of resolutions adopted by boards of directors. In the system that has emerged from certain legislative developments, it identifies a new system of rules on invalidity which, together with the rules governing invalid meeting resolutions, constitutes a special system differing from the rules governing the invalidity of contracts. Within this special system, the dissertation then identifies a single macro-category of invalidity, containing a graduated scale of cases according to the type of flaw and decision-making body involved. In light of these conclusions, the dissertation then goes on to examine the actual scope of the new provisions reflecting the legislator’s search for a fair solution that balances the harm suffered by a company when a resolution is challenged and that suffered by its shareholder or, more widely, by legal relationships when a flawed resolution remains in place. The dissertation finds – with regard to resolutions adopted by boards of directors – that the protection offered by the rules is not entirely effective, since they do not cover all possible flaws and do not allow shareholders to challenge flawed board resolutions.
18-apr-2012
Italiano
consiglio di amministrazione ; invalidità ; patologia ;nullità ; annullabilità ; inesistenza ; inefficacia ; delibere ; amministratori ; bilancio ; impugnazione
VENOSTA, FRANCESCO
Università degli Studi di Milano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
phd_unimi_R07688_1.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 68.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
68.43 kB Adobe PDF
phd_unimi_R07688_2.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 80.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
80.21 kB Adobe PDF
phd_unimi_R07688_3.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 282.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
282.53 kB Adobe PDF
phd_unimi_R07688_4.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 555.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
555.84 kB Adobe PDF
phd_unimi_R07688_5.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 358.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
358.21 kB Adobe PDF
phd_unimi_R07688_6.pdf

accesso solo da BNCF e BNCR

Dimensione 178.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
178.25 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/170074
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIMI-170074