Background Current treatment strategies in myelofiboris are based on Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Unfortunately, these treatments provide limited depth and durability of response. A potential new treatment paradigm is the combination of novel agents targeting different patways with the current used JAK inhibitors. Herein we present the results of a randomized clinical trial comparing pelabresib, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor, plus ruxolitinib, to placebo plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis. Methods In this Phase 3 study, JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib (125–175 mg) once daily for 14 days then a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or placebo, in combination with ruxolitinib (10–25 mg) twice daily. Primary endpoint was reduction in spleen volume of at least 35% from baseline at week 24. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in total symptom score (TSS), and TSS50 response (at least 50% reduction from baseline at week 24). Results The primary endpoint was achieved in 65.9% of patients randomized to pelabresib–ruxolitinib (n=214) versus 35.2% randomized to placebo–ruxolitinib (n=216) (difference: 30.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.6, 39.3; p<0.001). Absolute change in symptom score was -15.99 versus -14.05 (difference: -1.94; 95% CI: -3.92, 0.04; p=0.0545), and TSS50 was achieved in 52.3% versus 46.3% (difference: 6.0%; 95 CI: -3.5, 15.5; p=0.216), in the pelabresib–ruxolitinib group versus placebo–ruxolitinib group, respectively. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs of anemia were less frequent with pelabresib–ruxolitinib (43.9%; Grade ≥3: 23.1%) compared to placebo–ruxolitinib (55.6%; Grade ≥3: 36.4%). 2 Conclusions Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib provided substantial clinical benefit and was generally well tolerated, supporting a paradigm shift in front-line treatment for patients with myelofibrosis.
A phase 3 study of pelebresib plus ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis
PATRIARCA, ANDREA
2024
Abstract
Background Current treatment strategies in myelofiboris are based on Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Unfortunately, these treatments provide limited depth and durability of response. A potential new treatment paradigm is the combination of novel agents targeting different patways with the current used JAK inhibitors. Herein we present the results of a randomized clinical trial comparing pelabresib, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor, plus ruxolitinib, to placebo plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis. Methods In this Phase 3 study, JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis were randomized 1:1 to pelabresib (125–175 mg) once daily for 14 days then a 7-day break (21-day cycle), or placebo, in combination with ruxolitinib (10–25 mg) twice daily. Primary endpoint was reduction in spleen volume of at least 35% from baseline at week 24. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in total symptom score (TSS), and TSS50 response (at least 50% reduction from baseline at week 24). Results The primary endpoint was achieved in 65.9% of patients randomized to pelabresib–ruxolitinib (n=214) versus 35.2% randomized to placebo–ruxolitinib (n=216) (difference: 30.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.6, 39.3; p<0.001). Absolute change in symptom score was -15.99 versus -14.05 (difference: -1.94; 95% CI: -3.92, 0.04; p=0.0545), and TSS50 was achieved in 52.3% versus 46.3% (difference: 6.0%; 95 CI: -3.5, 15.5; p=0.216), in the pelabresib–ruxolitinib group versus placebo–ruxolitinib group, respectively. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs of anemia were less frequent with pelabresib–ruxolitinib (43.9%; Grade ≥3: 23.1%) compared to placebo–ruxolitinib (55.6%; Grade ≥3: 36.4%). 2 Conclusions Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib provided substantial clinical benefit and was generally well tolerated, supporting a paradigm shift in front-line treatment for patients with myelofibrosis.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Patriarca_PHD_Thesis_def.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
2.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/212756
URN:NBN:IT:UNIUPO-212756