In 1238, Robert Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, began to translate and comment on the Corpus Dionysiacum. Until now, no complete assessment of Pseudo-Dionysius’s contribution to Grosseteste’s thought has been attempted. The present dissertation aims to take a first step in filling in that blank sector in Grosseteste’s scholarship. I have demonstrated that Grosseteste used the Commentary to elaborate a sort of summary of theology. This summary is based on the three moments of the First Cause indicated in the prologue of the Hexaëmeron and the Deus est. It refers to the triadic movement of the First Principle (remaining-procession-return). In Grosseteste’s eyes, the Corpus develops this triad that was central to his theology, but that he was not able to deepen during his teaching years. According to this triad, God can be considered as He is in Himself, in his absolute transcendence, as the principle of the creation from which everything flows, and that leaves His similitude and image on it; as the ultimate goal of creation to whom everything tends and desires to return. In this scheme is possible to inscribe the whole theological production of Grosseteste. After a general conclusion, two unedited texts are inserted in the Appendix, namely: Book V (dedicated to the theonym ‘Being’) and Book VII (dedicated to the theonym ‘Wisdom’) of Grosseteste’s Commentary on the De divinis nominibus. [edited by Author]

Robert Grosseteste on God as Principle and End of Creation

CURIELLO, GIOACCHINO
2016

Abstract

In 1238, Robert Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, began to translate and comment on the Corpus Dionysiacum. Until now, no complete assessment of Pseudo-Dionysius’s contribution to Grosseteste’s thought has been attempted. The present dissertation aims to take a first step in filling in that blank sector in Grosseteste’s scholarship. I have demonstrated that Grosseteste used the Commentary to elaborate a sort of summary of theology. This summary is based on the three moments of the First Cause indicated in the prologue of the Hexaëmeron and the Deus est. It refers to the triadic movement of the First Principle (remaining-procession-return). In Grosseteste’s eyes, the Corpus develops this triad that was central to his theology, but that he was not able to deepen during his teaching years. According to this triad, God can be considered as He is in Himself, in his absolute transcendence, as the principle of the creation from which everything flows, and that leaves His similitude and image on it; as the ultimate goal of creation to whom everything tends and desires to return. In this scheme is possible to inscribe the whole theological production of Grosseteste. After a general conclusion, two unedited texts are inserted in the Appendix, namely: Book V (dedicated to the theonym ‘Being’) and Book VII (dedicated to the theonym ‘Wisdom’) of Grosseteste’s Commentary on the De divinis nominibus. [edited by Author]
14-giu-2016
Inglese
Areopagite
Grosseteste
God
D’Onofrio, Giulio
Counet, Jean-Michel
Conti, Alessandro
Università degli Studi di Salerno
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
117020736157880855540285852139807857918.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 5.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
81218882028538748471248680914387276615.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 103.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
103.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/311174
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNISA-311174