"La gestione della comunicazione dell'emergenza COVID in Italia e nei paesi avanzati del Pacifico Occidentale"

This research aims to analyze how the health emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic was managed from a communications perspective. I can say that a complex picture emerged, in which industry experts, scientists, and journalists bore a significant responsibility for what citizens learned and how safe and reassured they felt about what was happening. The data collected in this work served to highlight the differences in communication regarding the management of the health emergency dictated by the pandemic. Specifically, we focus on the protocols adopted in non-European countries, which were compared with those used in Italy. Italy, for example, has been held up as a model for managing the pandemic and containing the virus; numerous writings and newspaper articles support this thesis, which has received extensive coverage in national and international media. However, further investigation revealed a different interpretation of the data. Countries that were not even considered by the World Health Organization have implemented highly effective protocols capable of containing the virus, and in some cases, stemming it within a few months. To further my theory, I had already conducted research on several countries in the Far East and the Pacific, which have a high success rate. This research then allowed me to connect with sociologist Luca Ricolfi of the David Hume Foundation; a collaboration was born that proved crucial for me to delve deeper into my research. I then had the opportunity to write several articles that were published in the Hume Foundation's online journal. In particular, in my writings, I analyzed the pandemic situation in Asia and the advanced countries of the Western Pacific, the measures adopted to combat the virus, the management of communication by local media, and national attention, summarizing the findings of my research. The aim of the research was to provide a clear overview of the communication errors committed by our experts This research aims to analyze how the health emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic was managed from a communications perspective. I can say that a complex picture emerged, in which industry experts, scientists, and journalists bore a significant responsibility for what citizens learned and how safe and reassured they felt about what was happening. The data collected in this work served to highlight the differences in communication regarding the management of the health emergency dictated by the pandemic. Specifically, we focus on the protocols adopted in non-European countries, which were compared with those used in Italy. Italy, for example, has been held up as a model for managing the pandemic and containing the virus; numerous writings and newspaper articles support this thesis, which has received extensive coverage in national and international media. However, further investigation revealed a different interpretation of the data. Countries that were not even considered by the World Health Organization have implemented highly effective protocols capable of containing the virus, and in some cases, stemming it within a few months. To further my theory, I had already conducted research on several countries in the Far East and the Pacific, which have a high success rate. This research then allowed me to connect with sociologist Luca Ricolfi of the David Hume Foundation; a collaboration was born that proved crucial for me to delve deeper into my research. I then had the opportunity to write several articles that were published in the Hume Foundation's online journal. In particular, in my writings, I analyzed the pandemic situation in Asia and the advanced countries of the Western Pacific, the measures adopted to combat the virus, the management of communication by local media, and national attention, summarizing the findings of my research. The aim of the research was to provide a clear overview of the communication errors committed by our experts

Questa ricerca si propone di analizzare come è stata gestita l’emergenza sanitaria durante il Covid-19 dal punto di vista della comunicazione. Posso affermare che è emerso un quadro complesso dove esperti del settore, scienziati e giornalisti hanno avuto una grande responsabilità in merito a quanto i cittadini hanno appreso e a quanto si sono sentiti sicuri e rassicurati circa quello che stava accadendo. I dati raccolti in questo lavoro sono serviti a far emergere le differenze comunicative in relazione alla gestione dell’emergenza sanitaria dettata dalla pandemia; nello specifico parliamo dei protocolli adottati negli stati extra-europei che sono stati messi a confronto con quelli utilizzati in Italia. Il nostro Paese, ad esempio, stato eretto a modello da seguire per quanto concerne la gestione della pandemia e il contenimento del virus; ci sono numerosi scritti e articoli di giornale a supporto di questa tesi che ha trovato ampio spazio su media nazionali e internazionali. Tuttavia, approfondendo la ricerca, è emersa una diversa interpretazione dei dati. Paesi che non sono stati minimante presi in considerazione dall’Organizzazione mondiale della Sanità hanno avviato protocolli molto efficienti in grado di contenere il virus e in alcuni casi di arginarlo nel giro di pochi mesi. Per dare seguito alla mia teoria avevo già effettuato delle ricerche su alcuni paesi dell’Estremo Oriente e del Pacifico, i quali presentano un’elevata percentuale di successi. Queste ricerche mi hanno permesso poi di poter entrare in contatto con il sociologo Luca Ricolfi della Fondazione David Hume; ne è nata una collaborazione che per me si è rivelata fondamentale per poter approfondire il tema della mia ricerca. Ho avuto l’opportunità quindi di scrivere diversi articoli che sono stati pubblicati sulla rivista online della Fondazione Hume. In particolare, nei miei scritti, ho analizzato la situazione pandemica in Asia e nei paesi avanzati del Pacifico occidentale, le misure adottate per contrastare il virus, la gestione della comunicazione da parte dei media locali e l’attenzione nazionale, sintetizzando i risultati della mia ricerca. Lo scopo della ricerca quello di fornire una visione chiara degli errori comunicativi commessi