The work deepens the foggy post-structuralist notion of "discourse". According to Foucault's archeological method, i let react with each other Althusser's, Lacan's, and Foucault's himself, notions of "discourse". On a parallel level of the exposition, while the mentioned archeology develops, i theoretically introduce the notion of "ethical" subject, as a possible substitute for that "object" that comes out to be a mere effect of discourse: the supposed "thinking suject". Finally, I conclude by indicating in Foucault's genealogy, and in Lacan's ethics of psychoanlisis, two ways to divert "from the inside" the dominant neo-liberal discourse on ethics, together with the logical and practical connections that sustain - and are contemporary reproduced by - it.
Il lavoro approfondisce la nebulosa nozione post-strutturalista di “discorso”. Nella scia del metodo archeologico foucaultiano, cerco di far reagire l’una con l’altra le nozioni di discorso althusseriana, lacaniana e fouacultiana. Su un piano parallelo dell’esposizione, mentre questa archeologia si dispiega e approfondisce, cerco di introdurre la nozione teorica di soggetto etico, come possibile sostituto di quell’ “oggetto” che lentamente emerge dall’argomentazione come un mero effetto di discorso: il supposto “soggetto della coscienza”. Concludo infine indicando nella genealogia foucaultiana, e nella lacaniana etica della psicoanalisi, due modalità attraverso cui sarebbe forse possibile deviare “dal di dentro” l’etica peculiare al discorso neo-liberale, insieme alle relazioni logiche e pratiche che ne rappresentano contemporaneamente la causa e l’effetto.
Discorso e soggetto "etico" in Foucault e Lacan
MUNI, ANDREA
2016
Abstract
The work deepens the foggy post-structuralist notion of "discourse". According to Foucault's archeological method, i let react with each other Althusser's, Lacan's, and Foucault's himself, notions of "discourse". On a parallel level of the exposition, while the mentioned archeology develops, i theoretically introduce the notion of "ethical" subject, as a possible substitute for that "object" that comes out to be a mere effect of discourse: the supposed "thinking suject". Finally, I conclude by indicating in Foucault's genealogy, and in Lacan's ethics of psychoanlisis, two ways to divert "from the inside" the dominant neo-liberal discourse on ethics, together with the logical and practical connections that sustain - and are contemporary reproduced by - it.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Muni_Tesi.pdf
Open Access dal 21/04/2017
Dimensione
1.78 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.78 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/62674
URN:NBN:IT:UNITS-62674