Abstract Introduction. Placebo effect in the field of pain modulation is still less analyzed and explained, and the reasons of this don’t know. A computational evaluation of this phenomena is proposed trying to find a first explanation. Materials and methods. A comparison between a classical frequentist approach and a Bayesian one is presented basing on a model for repeated measures to test experimental data obtained from eight healthy subjects. Results. The results, in both of the statistical approaches, demonstrates that the placebo effect in the pain modulation, exists and is evident.

APPROCCIO FREQUENTISTA E BAYESIANO, DUE MODI DIVERSI DI VEDERE LA STESSA REALTÀ: APPLICAZIONI ALLA MODULAZIONE DEL DOLORE A MISURE RIPETUTE

GIANGRECO, MANUELA
2015

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Placebo effect in the field of pain modulation is still less analyzed and explained, and the reasons of this don’t know. A computational evaluation of this phenomena is proposed trying to find a first explanation. Materials and methods. A comparison between a classical frequentist approach and a Bayesian one is presented basing on a model for repeated measures to test experimental data obtained from eight healthy subjects. Results. The results, in both of the statistical approaches, demonstrates that the placebo effect in the pain modulation, exists and is evident.
15-gen-2015
Italiano
biostatistics; bayesian; frequentist; repeated measures
DECARLI, ADRIANO
DECARLI, ADRIANO
Università degli Studi di Milano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
phd_unimi_R09138.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 445.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
445.4 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/76362
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIMI-76362