Through in-depth case studies, methodological analysis, and empirical research, the PhD dissertation explores the interaction of economic modeling, expert testimony, and the Daubert standard in the context of antitrust litigation. It defends the viability of de-idealization strategies when developing economic models, proposes a framework to understand how models from industrial economics are applied in concrete legal proceedings, and examines their alignment with the Daubert standard, as well as their potential impact on court decisions.
Essays on Economic Modeling and Expert Testimony in Antitrust Litigation
PERUZZI, EDOARDO
2024
Abstract
Through in-depth case studies, methodological analysis, and empirical research, the PhD dissertation explores the interaction of economic modeling, expert testimony, and the Daubert standard in the context of antitrust litigation. It defends the viability of de-idealization strategies when developing economic models, proposes a framework to understand how models from industrial economics are applied in concrete legal proceedings, and examines their alignment with the Daubert standard, as well as their potential impact on court decisions.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
phd_unisi_106416.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
757.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
757.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/87982
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è
URN:NBN:IT:UNISI-87982