This work addresses the issues of competition and inventions in the U.S. employment relationships. The research was carried out in part at the Boston University School of Law of, under the supervision of Micheal C. Harper, professor of Labour Law. The selection of the topic is justified in the light of its importance, given that in the new production organization, based largely on globalized knowledge, employees are now increasingly being asked for professionalism, innovation and creativity. The decision to examine this issue from the perspective of the "U.S. laboratory" is due to the primacy that this nation holds at international level on the economic, scientific and innovation of work processes, which bring out critical issues that in other Countries probably have not yet been raised. In order to frame the above-mentioned topics, it has become appropriate to give an account of the system of regulatory sources in the USA, with particular focus on the Restatement of Employment Law, i.e. the collection of fundamental principles developed over the years by common law in the field of employment relationships. The examination of the sources is followed by the definition of the concept of employee and self-employed worker (independent contractor), necessary for the assessment of the application of the obligations arising from the employment relationships, including the duty of loyalty, involved in the fiduciary law. In this context, the evolution of the case law has been observed, as well as the examination of the criteria relating to the distinction between employees and independent contractors, mainly concerning the judgement on the relevance of the factual elements determining the assessment of the existence of an employment relationship. Subsequently, this study addresses the issue of the typical form of the U.S. employment contract, the so-called employment-at-will. This peculiarity is originated from the principle that the parties are not bound by any obligation to provide reasons for termination. The third part of the work has as its object the discipline of competition of the worker carried out on the basis of the knowledge acquired, legally or illegally, during the relationship and the relative legal remedies for the employer, against the violation of the duty of loyalty, intended as an obligation of the employee to perform the work in the exclusive interest of the entrepreneur and, consequently, to refrain from engaging in prejudicial conduct against the company. About the remedies available in the event of breach of the obligations examined, the legal and equitable remedies that U.S. law offers the employer have been explained. The final part of this study deals with the rules governing the ownership of rights arising from inventions developed by employees in the course of their employment. The definitions of "invention" and "patent" and their relationship in the context of employment law has been examined and the difference between invention as a work of genius and intellectual property protected by copyright has been highlighted. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the basic rules governing the subject matter and their coexistence with the contractual freedom of the parties and their power to dispose of these rights have been observed.

Knowledge workers management. Concorrenza e invenzioni nel rapporto di lavoro subordinato: il modello statunitense

PISANI, FEDERICO
2019

Abstract

This work addresses the issues of competition and inventions in the U.S. employment relationships. The research was carried out in part at the Boston University School of Law of, under the supervision of Micheal C. Harper, professor of Labour Law. The selection of the topic is justified in the light of its importance, given that in the new production organization, based largely on globalized knowledge, employees are now increasingly being asked for professionalism, innovation and creativity. The decision to examine this issue from the perspective of the "U.S. laboratory" is due to the primacy that this nation holds at international level on the economic, scientific and innovation of work processes, which bring out critical issues that in other Countries probably have not yet been raised. In order to frame the above-mentioned topics, it has become appropriate to give an account of the system of regulatory sources in the USA, with particular focus on the Restatement of Employment Law, i.e. the collection of fundamental principles developed over the years by common law in the field of employment relationships. The examination of the sources is followed by the definition of the concept of employee and self-employed worker (independent contractor), necessary for the assessment of the application of the obligations arising from the employment relationships, including the duty of loyalty, involved in the fiduciary law. In this context, the evolution of the case law has been observed, as well as the examination of the criteria relating to the distinction between employees and independent contractors, mainly concerning the judgement on the relevance of the factual elements determining the assessment of the existence of an employment relationship. Subsequently, this study addresses the issue of the typical form of the U.S. employment contract, the so-called employment-at-will. This peculiarity is originated from the principle that the parties are not bound by any obligation to provide reasons for termination. The third part of the work has as its object the discipline of competition of the worker carried out on the basis of the knowledge acquired, legally or illegally, during the relationship and the relative legal remedies for the employer, against the violation of the duty of loyalty, intended as an obligation of the employee to perform the work in the exclusive interest of the entrepreneur and, consequently, to refrain from engaging in prejudicial conduct against the company. About the remedies available in the event of breach of the obligations examined, the legal and equitable remedies that U.S. law offers the employer have been explained. The final part of this study deals with the rules governing the ownership of rights arising from inventions developed by employees in the course of their employment. The definitions of "invention" and "patent" and their relationship in the context of employment law has been examined and the difference between invention as a work of genius and intellectual property protected by copyright has been highlighted. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the basic rules governing the subject matter and their coexistence with the contractual freedom of the parties and their power to dispose of these rights have been observed.
set-2019
Italiano
KNOWLEDGE WORKERS MANAGEMENT CONCORRENZA E INVENZIONI NEL RAPPORTO DI LAVORO SUBORDINATO: IL MODELLO STATUNITENSE IL DIRITTO DEL LAVORO NEGLI USA; 1. Le fonti del diritto del lavoro; 2. Il “Restatement of Employment Law”; II. AUTONOMIA E SUBORDINAZIONE; 3. Definizione di lavoratore subordinato e lavoratore autonomo (Employees v Independent contractors); 4. Il Direct and Control Test; 5. L’Economic Realities Test; 6. L’ABC Test; III. IL RAPPORTO DI LAVORO A LIBERA RECEDIBILITÀ; 7. Il c.d. “Employment-at-will”; 8. Divieto di licenziamento per contrarietà all’ordine pubblico (Public-policy exception); 9. Licenziamento illegittimo per violazione di clausole implicite (Implied-contract exception); 10. Licenziamento illegittimo per violazione degli obblighi di buona fede contrattuale (Covenant-of-good-faith exception); IV. CONCORRENZA DEL LAVORATORE E TECNICHE DI TUTELA DEL DATORE DI LAVORO; 11. Il Duty of Loyalty nel Common Law ; 12. Fiduciary Relationship (rapporto fiduciario); 13. La genesi del duty of loyalty: il rapporto di agenzia (The Principal-Agent Relationship) e il rapporto di lavoro subordinato (Employer-Employee Relationship); 14. Duty of loyalty come fiduciary duty; 15. Elementi integranti la responsabilità contrattuale per violazione del duty of loyalty: a) concorrenza diretta ed indiretta (Direct v. Indirect Competition); 16. (Segue) b) Concorrenza e attività preparatorie (Competition v Mere Business Preparation); 17. (Segue) c) Attività concorrenziale svolta in segreto dal dipendente e acquiescenza del datore di lavoro (Secrecy of Employee Activities v Knowledge by the Employer); 18. (Segue) d) Duty of loyalty e scarso rendimento (poor performance); 19. (Segue) e) Dirigenti e dipendenti in posizioni non apicali (High Level Managerial v. Non-Managerial Employees); 20. Fattispecie tipiche: a) Storno di dipendenti (Soliciting) o ricerca e selezione di personale per la nuova attività (Hiring Co-workers of the Employer); 21. (Segue) b) Sfruttamento delle informazioni sulla clientela del datore di lavoro (Customer Lists); 22. (Segue) c) Sviamento di clientela (Contacting and Soliciting Customers and Clients of the Employer); 23. (Segue) d) Abuso del diritto di critica. Ordine pubblico (“Public Policy”), segnalazioni e denunce per fatti illeciti (Whistleblowing), relazioni sindacali (“Labor Relations”) e Social Media e Blogging; 24. Tecniche di tutela: a) Legal remedies; 25. (Segue) b) Tort Damages (risarcimento per fatto illecito); 26. (Segue) c) Equitable remedies (rimedi secondo equità): Injunction (inibitoria); Replevin (azione di rivendicazione); Constructive Trust; 27. Patto di non concorrenza (restrictive covenant o covenant-not-to-compete); 28. Interferenza illecita nei rapporti commerciali (Tort of Intentional Interference with Contract); 29. Appropriazione illecita di segreti commerciali (Misappropriation of Trade Secrets); 30. Conclusioni; V. INVENZIONI DEL LAVORATORE; 31. Invenzione e brevetto; 32. La titolarità dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale sulle invenzioni sviluppate dai dipendenti; 33. Leggi statali che limitano l’autonomia negoziale delle parti; 34. (Segue) Leggi statali permissive nei confronti dei pre-invention agreements; 35. (Segue) le interpretazioni giurisprudenziali sui limiti imposti dalle leggi statali
TOPO, ADRIANA
FUSARO, ARIANNA
Università degli studi di Padova
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pisani_federico_tesi.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.7 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/97555
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIPD-97555