Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, it is documented widely in scientific literature with original articles and reviews. The screening for CAV is generally performed on an annual or biannual basis. It is usually detected by conventional coronary angiography (CCA) but in the last ten years, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) has spreading more in more in the study of early detection of CAV due to evolution of technologies. Technological advances such as 64-slice dual-source CCTA or 128-slice dual-source CCTA might justify re-evaluation of the current recommendation in the detection of CAV. Inspired by the high quality intravascular CAV detection (IVUS and OCT), I considered the CCTA as new diagnostical procedure with low-technical risk and high technologies and I developed my PhD issue in order to have the following endpoints: improving heart transplant recipient survival and decreasing/controlling the CAV incidence by rapid and early treatment. I conjectured: i) Which would be the new perspectives in CAV diagnostic imaging? ii) Considering the CCTA technological evolution, how could be the comparison with CCA? iii) How is the comparison with other recommended intravascular diagnostic procedures like IVUS? iv) Could I create a prognostic score to calculate indirectly the risk of CAV in heart transplanted patients in order to improve its management?

New perspectives in the diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: the CT-scan role in the follow-up of heart transplanted patients

COTTINI, MARZIA
2020

Abstract

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, it is documented widely in scientific literature with original articles and reviews. The screening for CAV is generally performed on an annual or biannual basis. It is usually detected by conventional coronary angiography (CCA) but in the last ten years, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) has spreading more in more in the study of early detection of CAV due to evolution of technologies. Technological advances such as 64-slice dual-source CCTA or 128-slice dual-source CCTA might justify re-evaluation of the current recommendation in the detection of CAV. Inspired by the high quality intravascular CAV detection (IVUS and OCT), I considered the CCTA as new diagnostical procedure with low-technical risk and high technologies and I developed my PhD issue in order to have the following endpoints: improving heart transplant recipient survival and decreasing/controlling the CAV incidence by rapid and early treatment. I conjectured: i) Which would be the new perspectives in CAV diagnostic imaging? ii) Considering the CCTA technological evolution, how could be the comparison with CCA? iii) How is the comparison with other recommended intravascular diagnostic procedures like IVUS? iv) Could I create a prognostic score to calculate indirectly the risk of CAV in heart transplanted patients in order to improve its management?
14-gen-2020
Inglese
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy; cardiac transplantation; heart transplantation
SARDELLA, Gennaro
PIGNATELLI, Pasquale
VENUTA, Federico
Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tesi_dottorato_Cottini.pdf

Open Access dal 01/01/2020

Dimensione 2.84 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.84 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/98614
Il codice NBN di questa tesi è URN:NBN:IT:UNIROMA1-98614